Moral Responsibility in Laws

Staunch separatismists believed in the deterrent example superiority of whites. Consequently, to them, the segregation statutes were just police forces that it was their clean-living responsibility to promote and protect. Significantly, they relied on the same God to which King referred to justify the segregation statutes.

Henry David Thoreau's channel in favor of civil noncompliance sheds some light on the question. Thoreau argues that the only obligation the governed obligate a right to assume is the obligation to do at any time what they think is right (Thoreau, 1). Thoreau argues that a regime's chest is only just when it has the sanction and consent of the governed (Thoreau, 10). Thus, a somebody has a clean-living responsibility to dis pursue an unjust natural law because a somebody cannot be governed by a law that she has not sanctioned. This argument assumes that a individual will not sanction a law they find to be unjust. Thus, Thoreau's argument places the individual as the basis of the government and a government can have no rights over a person and her property but what she concedes to it (Thoreau, 10).

In particular, Thoreau argued that American citizens should not obey their federal government because the government unjustly sanctioned bondage (Thoreau, 2). He argued that there are cases where a people or an individual mustinessiness do justice "cost what it ma

What then of the case where the U.S. Congress passes a constitutional amendment prohibiting all abortions? If you are a woman who believes she has a right to an abortion, Thoreau's argument would seem to indicate that you must refuse the constitutional amendment because you have not sanctioned it and therefore cannot be governed by it. Yet King's argument would raise the question of the monetary value done to the fetus and the reference to the fetus as a "thing." Regardless of questions of viability, a fetus is organic matter that is washed-up during an abortion.

Consequently, just as King believes we have a moral responsibility to oppose a law that treats human beings as "things," would not a woman have a moral responsibility to obey the law banning abortions because it treats a fetus as a "thing"?

Thus, while Crito suggests that a person must stand true to their personal moral convictions all the same in the face of death, it also holds that a person must oppose morally unsound laws within the legal limits of her government. Thus, Plato argues that we owe our only moral responsibility to God, but our personal uprightness requires that we must bear out by the laws of the country in which we learn to live even when they would affect us negatively. Crito then advocates that a woman in a country that bans abortions must abide by the laws of that country even if she personally opposes the ban.

y" and believed in the existence of an "absolute goodness" against which just and unjust laws could be measured (Thoreau, 2). Consequently, Thoreau argues that if a person believes a law is wrong, she must not obey it.

Consequently, King's argument suggests that anti-abortion laws should be violated because a person has a moral responsibility to
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.