Self-questioning and Thoughts about Death

In the Goodrich case, this conclusion is distinctly true. Not only were the workers at Goodrich suffering from bad consciences, the results were pricey to the company. Some of the participants seemed to benefit from promotions, but in the farseeing-run the results whitethorn be different if they continue to make un complaisanceable decisions in the name of "loyalty" to the company, or because they think it will serving them get such promotions.

The most important part of honourable business decisions is the individual. At any point in the long process of many an(prenominal) decisions made in the Goodrich case, any of the many individuals could have stopped the lies---if he had been willing to pretermit his business organization. However, none of the men were willing to take that chance and take that ethical stand. This is wherefore it is so important that a company require an ethical workplace that helps individuals make the right decisions.

As Cordtz writes, with respect to the relationship between the individual and the company,

For the most part, the managers on the sackful line are more concerned with staying out of trouble. The graduation objective of just about entirely corporate ethics programs is to make sure that all employees understand the laws and regulations that apply to their companies. . . . "That's why when we get into a program, we insist that top management be totally involved" (Cordtz "Ethicsplosion" 60).

In other words, it is the company's responsib

In all three cases, the decisions made by the workers and managers at Goodrich were unethical. The decisions to hide the facts on the tests for the brakes did non perfect the satisfactions of all the parties, did not respect the rights of the individuals, and was not consistent with the canons of justice.

However, businesses cannot do this unless they let individuals know that making an ethical decision is not only the right thing to do, but that it will be rewarded.

At the same time, it should be made clear to all workers and mangers that unethical decisions will be punished. By giving promotions to ii managers at Goodrich who took part in the snake oil, the company showed that doing what one was told to do and staying "loyal" to the company will be rewarded. This is just the opposite word of the message that the company should be sending to its individual workers.

" reading and Writing Across the Curricula." 737-740.

In other words, Vandivier knew that it was wrong to go along with the fraud, but he looked at what he would lose if he refused to go along with it. He would lose his job and the security that went with it for himself and his large family. The point is not that Vandivier is a worn down man, but that every individual can be tempted or frightened into making an unethical decision. So we see that in many if not most cases the individual has the odds against him or her when it comes to standing up and making the right decision. This is especially true when everybody else in the company is taking part in the fraud and the unethical decisions.

Vandivier knows it was wrong and dangerous, but he writes that

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.