The Difference between The EU & The US

atomic number 63, on the other hand, is not forming a union in order to break aside from a government that rules it and oppresses it. To be sure, some would argue that the get together States of America, being a super baron, does have an inordinate summate of power over Europe and that, at least in part, it is U.S. pressure and power from which Europe wants to break away (Kagan, 2003). Still, it takes instead a stretch to compare U.S. pressure on diverse countries of Europe (many of them with relatively pro-US feelings) to that exerted by a Monarchy that ruled its colonies with an straighten out fist over 200 years prior.

An additional tone of the EU is to avoid war among its fraction nations (Kagan, 2003). In this regard, Europe has a history of terrible wars and this also affects its willingness to form an overarching union. The amity that the EU will confer on member nations mountain do much to all(a)ow Europe to become a major world power, with an economy that can compete with the U.S. economy. (Kagan, 2003). precisely the unity not only confers power, it also helps to avoid differences, encounter and turmoil that could set member nations against one another and formerly again lead to war.

Regarding organization, both the United States and the EU rig out themselves using overarching principles. Once again, a large element of the organizational make-up of the United States is to maintain freedom through political science bod

Pinder, J. (2001). The European Union: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

However, if one examines the organizing concepts (pillars) of the EU, maintaining the freedom of individual member nations such that their governing bodies hold a level of power that may in some instances challenge or sluice over-rule the EU is not a strong concern. Rather, the focus is on setting up a set of standards, rules, regulations and policies by which all of the member nations of the EU must abide (Raphael, 2001). To this end, the governing bodies of the EU comprise a far more stringent top-down organization of power with less emphasis upon the governing self-assurance of individual members than does the United States.

ies which act as a " checkout counter and balance" upon one another (Hakim, 2001). Also related to the internality notion of freedom is the fact that the governing power invested in the individual states that comprise America is not totally subservient to the national government. Indeed, there exist hundreds of years of litigation that give and maintain the governing power of states, even when challenged by the federal government.

Raphael, R. (2001). A people's history of the American revolution. New York: New Press.

Kagan, R. (2
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.