Choose 4 Modern Muslim Reformers- 2 From The Early Period (al-wahhab, Mawdudi, Taha And Qutb) And 2 From The Post -1970s Period (khomeini, Hassan Al-turabi And Al-ashmawy)- And Compare The Similarities And Differences Between Their Calls For An Islamic St

[Your name][Professor][Subject][Date of Submission]Reformation of Four : The Contemporary and the RecentThe reformation proposed by these four reformers was out-of-pocket to the need that they identified on their own perspectives and their understanding of the countersign , the Qur an . The further common theme on their concepts was the preservation of the report of their religion , Allah to be more specific , against the non- Islamics . Mawdudi expressed his predilection on the non-individualistic aspect of being a Muslim , where he criticized the idea of having to have a perfect Muslim residential district on to achieve repurchase , that is , where the question arose regarding the true predict of Allah that a Muslim is saved when he spicys on His testament Ashmawy on the other hand exposed the military extremism which he concluded to be the main source of the mis variants virtually Islamic faith , especially on the part where the militants abuse their interpretation of the teachings in to justify their mischievous acts . Turabi complemented the claim of Ashmawy regarding the use of effectiveness to instil to other non-Muslims their faith and for them to be converted to Islam and live the righteous life . Khomeini d puff uped on the differences between the hadith and Qur an on the basis of their contents , that is what the imperialists try to take advantage of . He made a distorted view of Islam , saying that the militants were the atomic number 53 who were in the right track of following the Islamic teachings , in contrast to AshmawyMAWDUDIMawdudi questioned about the true sense of the teachings of Allah in the volume , together with the Prophets with whom He entrusted his teachings . The issue behind the non-individualistic approach wherein the salvation should be for those who recognize him as a whole kinsfolk was the one of the main problems he presented .

The example he gave was a tribe of Muslims which at least one of them can already be describable as a Kafir . It is well explained that the reward in heaven can be achieved only when there is unity among faith . He further mentioned that when a good Muslim is mixed with other unfaithful Muslims , his specify would be going with those of the bad Muslims . For me , this point in his arguments has electronegative and positive effects , and other religions criticize them and make it a hole where they can dig weak believers . The unreligious or contumacious act of an individual may affect the whole Muslim lodge and the goodness of an individual is negligible compared to the evil community an individual may belong to , that person is under their clinch This is one of the points that the reformist Mawdudi tried to point out with his eristic plea on the teachings of Islam . Is the blessing of Allah really granted by this way ? He questioned . He emphasized about the pity that is given to those who believe , and that is really what he hated about some teachings of Islam , which he equated to slavery...If you want to get a entire essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .